Red Bull Dominance Sparks Massive Backlash from Competitors

Zak Brown criticized the close collaboration between Red Bull Racing and its sister team under the budget cap era, sparking tension with Christian Horner and debate over F1’s team independence and shared components, while Horner defended Red Bull’s investment and contribution to F1 amidst differing views on the sport’s regulations and team dynamics.

Highlights

‣ The tension between Zak Brown and Christian Horner was highlighted during a press conference, stemming from Brown’s criticism of the close collaboration between Red Bull Racing and Visa Cash App RB, which he views as unfair under the current F1 budget cap.

‣ Zak Brown advocates for the elimination of B teams in Formula 1, arguing that the sport should consist of 10 independent teams to ensure a level playing field, both fiscally and technically, in the era of the budget cap.

‣ Laurent Mekies of VCARB counters Brown’s argument by emphasizing the financial and competitive challenges small teams face, even with the budget cap, and defends the sharing of components between teams as a means to maintain a sustainable business model and competitive balance.

‣ Christian Horner defends Red Bull’s investment in Formula 1 and its two teams, highlighting the significant contributions the company has made to the sport, including supporting both teams through financial crises and the COVID-19 pandemic, and argues for recognition of Red Bull’s commitment rather than criticism.


Last week’s press conference was thick with tension. Zak Brown and Christian Horner were at the heart of it. Despite Brown’s insistence that his comments weren’t personal attacks, the Red Bull teams felt targeted. This set a frosty mood not just at the conference but also in the paddock.

Zak Brown has been stirring the pot recently. He’s openly criticized the close ties between Red Bull Racing and Visa Cash App RB. To him, such partnerships seem unfair, especially with F1’s budget cap in place. He questions the necessity of B teams in the sport.

At Thursday’s press conference, an interesting trio took the stage: Brown, Laurent Mekies of VCARB, and Horner. Given the winter’s discussions, their opinions were eagerly awaited. Brown was the first to speak.

**Why Brown wants to get rid of the Red Bull teams**

“Sports evolve,” Brown began. He pointed out the budget cap’s role in leveling the playing field. No other major sport allows two teams under the same ownership to compete, he argued. In his view, F1 should consist of 10 independent teams, each unique in its sporting, political, and technical aspects. “They’re playing by the rules,” he admitted, but he took issue with the rules themselves, suggesting the FIA should revisit them. Brown’s critique didn’t sit well with Visa Cash App RB, who felt unfairly labeled as a ‘B-team.’ Despite being under Red Bull’s umbrella, they aim to compete at the same level, evidenced by their significant off-season investments.

VCARB’s response? They’re standing on their own, aiming high. Why else would industry heavyweights join them if they were merely copying Red Bull?

**Why Red Bull disagree with Brown**

VCARB sees things differently. They argue that F1’s current setup, even with the budget cap, doesn’t allow smaller teams to compete with the giants. Mekies highlighted the regulations allowing component sharing, aimed at narrowing the field’s competitive gap. Yet, the disparity remains significant. Without the ability to buy parts from larger teams, the gap would only widen, he warned.

“The regulations offer a sustainable business model,” Mekies added, emphasizing the need for a long-term perspective on F1’s health.

**Horner seeks attack with a speech about Red Bull**

Then, Horner took the stage, defending Red Bull’s dual-team strategy. He reminded everyone of Red Bull’s commitment to F1, even during tough times like the 2008 financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic. “Red Bull’s investment should be applauded,” he argued, highlighting the separate operations of the two teams.

**Why competitors are attacking Red Bull Racing**

Horner’s lengthy response seemed to serve another purpose: to dodge further scrutiny. The underlying issue? Red Bull Racing’s dominance. Competitors are keen to challenge this, using any means necessary, including the Horner investigation and the teams’ cooperation. “It’s typical Formula 1,” Verstappen commented, unfazed by the controversy.

In the world of F1, the drama off the track often rivals the action on it. This saga is no exception, blending strategy, competition, and a bit of politics into the high-speed world of racing.

Albert Ramirez
Albert Ramirez
Albert Ramirez is a senior writer at F1Highlights.com. With a passion for motorsports, Albert brings a unique perspective to the world of Formula One. With over five years of experience as a sports reporter, he has honed his skills in capturing the essence of the sport.

Related F1 News